Measurement Criteria
1. 23
CFR 627.5 TEA-21.
2.
3. Proposal Notes 103
and 104, Value Engineering in Construction.
4. Value Engineering
Policy 27-008(P) issued
5. Value Engineering
in Construction Standard Procedure 510-008(SP) issued
Monitoring Method
1. Interview with
District Production Administrator, District Construction Engineer and
2. Review District
files on Value Engineering for conformance with the Procedure using checklist.
3. Visit at least one
Project, if available, that has VECP submittals, and review using checklist.
4. Interview at least
two project Engineers.
5. Document best
practices
1. All 12 Districts
will be reviewed each year.
Results Reported
1. Written report to
the District within 2 weeks of review.
2. Written summary
report published annually
Result Shared
Written annual report
to:
1. State Construction
Engineer
2. Deputy Director of
Construction Management.
3. Assistant Director
for Highway Management.
4. Administrator
Office of Construction
5. FHWA.
6. DDD, DCE, DHMA,
Office of Quality
Compliance Tracking
1. QAR files in the Division of Construction
Management.
Compliance Follow-up
1.
Review of District performance until improved to
desired level.
2.
Review
of District supplied corrective plan if warranted.
Deputy Director
Signature _______________________________________Date ____________
Quality Assurance Review
District: ______
Central Office Reviewer: ________________________ Date of Review: _________
District Highway
Management Administrator: ________________________________________
District Production
Administrator: ________________________________________
District Construction
Engineer: ________________________________________
_______Has the District received a VECP from a contractor in the last year?
If no, skip to Review District Procedure.
Project Office
Review:
Project Engineer / Supervisor: _________________________ Value Engineered Project: ________
Review documents for Procedure
compliance:
Does District correspondence regarding a past VECP initial submission indicate review was completed within 5 working days?
Explanation: _________________________________________________________________
Does District correspondence regarding a past VECP indicate the preliminary review by the following District Offices as required?
_______Planning, _______Production, _______Highway Management,
_______Real Estate, _______Construction
Explanation: _________________________________________________________________
Does the District file the final VECP plans along with project plans, and send a copy to CO?
Explanation: _________________________________________________________________
VECP Requirements:
Were VECP related change orders and extra work orders entered in a timely manner? Days: __
Explanation: _________________________________________________________________
Did the Contractor supply adequate final plans and estimates?
Explanation: _________________________________________________________________
Are project personnel aware of the proposed VECP?
Explanation: _________________________________________________________________
After completion of the VECP, were revised full plans received?
Explanation: _________________________________________________________________
Review District
Procedure
Does the District staff have a clear understanding of the VECP Policy, and Standard Procedure?
Explanation: _________________________________________________________________
Does the District have a designated VECP coordinator?
Explanation: _________________________________________________________________
Is the District aware of the new VECP rules for submissions valued under $50,000?
Explanation: _________________________________________________________________